7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies

Mini Tracks – Calls for Papers
Action research Computer modelling and simulations Ethnographic methods Grounded theory Mixed Methods Researching sensitive topics Teaching research methods The role of paradigms in business and IS research	Tell a friend
Mini track on Action Research Track chair: Dr Peter Sharp, Regents Business School, London, UK Action research is considered by some business researchers as the ideal methodology for doing relevant and valuable research in business and management. This approach often gives rise to valuable insights about how to do action research effectively, research ethics issues that need to be addressed when this approach is implemented and the need to consider carefully the contexts in which to apply it. You are invited to submit papers on this approach. This mini track seeks to build on the mini track from previous ECRM conferences and aims to discuss inter alia the forms of action research that have been used in business research, research ethics issues that arise from implementation of this approach, and what can be learnt by those who have or are implementing action research in business contexts. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	Peter Sharp
Mini-track on computer modelling and simulations Track chair: Dr Kristina Risom, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark Computer-based modelling and simulations are gaining increased attention in business research communities in all fields of social science. Agent-based modelling is used in macro economics and natural science, but this methodology is new in business research. Highly regarded journals are publishing methodological papers in this area, but still many researchers do not know what it is all about nor does there exist a coherent community, as such, for computer modelling in the social sciences and business research. To increase knowledge and awareness of computer modeling and simulations as a new methodological approach with high potential, papers are invited to this mini track aiming for a discussion of progress and experiences with computer modelling and simulations. Recommended topics include, but are not limited to, the following: Agent-based social simulations of business processes; Computational intelligence and business processes; Computer modelling and business process simulations, e.g.: Innovation/new product development, organisational learning, marketing/sales, logistics and business management; Computer modelling and simulation of business networks; Computer modelling and simulation of value chain behavior; Computer modelling and simulation of markets; Computer modelling and simulation of industries; Computer modelled scenarios of business processes; Comparison of different research methods with computer modelling and/or simulations. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	Kristina Risom
Mini track on Ethnographic methods Track chair: Dr Ibrahim Sirkeci, European Business School London, UK Ethnographic methods associated with Anthropology and Sociology are increasingly being used to analyse business settings too. The ethnographic method, revolving around systematic observation and gaining access to the cultural setting, has gained wide popularity in the business world. ECRM 2008 seeks original, high-quality contributions in scholarly and practical contexts which will reflect the full breadth of the ethnographic methods including methodological and conceptual progress, research design, field experiences, research findings, measurement issues, value and applications of ethnographic research in business settings and beyond. Contributions may report original research, conceptual discussions, case studies, comments and insights. We encourage comparative studies, multi/inter-disciplinary approaches, and best practices. Abstract submissions from all social science disciplines along with business disciplines are welcome. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	Ibrahim Sirkeci
Mini track on Grounded Theory Track chair: Dr George Allan, University of Portsmouth, UK Grounded Theory Methodology as an approach to research continues to gather recognition. In acknowledgment of its significance within business and management inquiry, ECRM continues to dedicate a track to the methodology. As an indication of its positioning within mainstream methods of enquiry, this call for Grounded Theory seeks to take stock of this methodological approach by attracting papers from a broad base. Therefore we would like to see creative and innovative applications of Grounded Theory Methodology emphasising practical and theoretical dimensions of ontology, epistemology and methodology, set within business and management research. Examples being: Empirical Applications; Theoretical Papers; Classical Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss); Revised Grounded Theory; Combination of Classical and Revised Approaches; Grounded Theory with Multi-methods; Grounded Theory combined with Case Study; Computer Based Support of Grounded Theory (eg. Atlas.ti, Nudist); Grounded Theory uses in any Business & Management Field of Interest; The Future of Grounded Theory; Grounded Theory and Post-Modernism; Critiques of the processes of Grounded Theory; Building using Grounded Theory. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	George Allan
Mini track on Mixed Methods Track co-chairs: Dr David Douglas, Staffordshire University Business School, UK and Dr Branka Krivokapic-Skoko, Faculty of Business, Charles Sturt University, Australia Mixed Methods has been defined as, ‘Research design using qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis techniques in either parallel or sequential phases’ (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003). Within the context of a traditional divide between quantitative and qualitative research mixed methods have also been also referred to as the “Third Methodological Movement’ (Ibidem) This is the inauguration of a new dedicated track at ‘ECRM’ to the topic of mixing methods in business and management research. The subject has witnessed increasing interest over the last few years, with a growing range of philosophical, ontological, epistemological and practical debates on various approaches to mixing methods in seeking to establish one’s warranted research claims. The new track would like to broaden the discussion on mixed methods, to include not only mixing ‘qualitative with quantitative’, but to include the mixing of two or more ‘qualitative’ research methods. Thus we are interested in receiving papers focusing on your research that addresses example issues like, but not limited to, the following: Purposes of Mixing Methods: Paradoxes, contradictions or unanticipated perspectives; Clarification and ‘complementarity’ of results from two or more methods; Develop results from one method to help develop or inform another method; Convergence of findings for confirmation and to strengthen validity (Triangulation); Expand breadth and range of inquiry by using different methods. Approaches, Timing and Variation: Prioritization: Qualitative then Quantitative, or, Quantitative then Qualitative, or both Equally; Sequential, or, Concurrent methods – one after another or one with another; Waving, e.g. Quantitative (start), Qualitative (Wave 1), Quantitative (Wave 2), etc. Strengths & Weaknesses Debates: Narrative adding meaning to numbers and numbers adding precision to words: Innovative ways of integrating qualitative and quantitative data; Generating and testing of theory; Stronger evidence for conclusion (convergence and corroboration); Improved insight and understanding; Increase the potential for generalizability; Single researcher’s skill and ability; Validity and potential for error; Paradigm mixing problems and Standardization issues; Interpretation of conflicting results and different scales, samples and sample sizes; Data Transformation, Categorization, Coding and Interpretation, etc, textual data transformed into a quantitative data matrix; Individual v aggregation of cases and their analysis; case-oriented quantification;. Qualitative comparative analysis; Non-independence of observations and numbers, randomization and assumptions; Computer technology for integrating mixed method data. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	David Douglas Branka Krivokapic-Skoko
Mini track on Researching Sensitive Topics Track chair: Gisela Schulte Agyeman, Educational Psychologist, City Psychological Service, Kingston-upon-Hull Researching topic areas and issues that are not considered to be ‘mainstream’ poses a range of challenges for researchers wishing to shed light on under-represented, marginalised groups or taboo issues in organisations. These range from methodological considerations and research paradigms to those covering ethics, power and politics. The mini-track offers the opportunity to explore a wide range of topics that are considered to be ‘sensitive’ within organisations. It raises questions about how topics are identified, the role of the researcher (as outsider/insider) in the process and how findings can be publicly disseminated whilst ensuring that confidentiality and ethical principles are adhered to. The track welcomes contributions which cover a diverse range of issues, such as ethnicity, race, gender, age, disability, sexuality, ill-health, mental health, stress, relationships at work, intimacy, bullying, emotions in organisations, ideology, propaganda, union membership, whistle blowing, trust and distrust, honesty, work and home life balance, superstitions, belief and disbelief, faith, religion and cultural practices. Research topics may also include the anomalies and paradoxes of everyday organisational life that are often under-explored or un-examined; the hidden aspects of organisational life, the dynamics and actual practices that occur which are un-stated, the contradictions and tensions, unexpected and unexplained where these are of a sensitive nature. We are looking for diverse and original contributions, both in scripting and delivery/performance. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.
Mini track on Teaching research methods Track chair: Dr Martin Rich, CASS Business School, London, UK This mini-track on teaching research methods covers an area where there is a significant link between teaching and research. One suitable topic is the formal teaching of research methods in higher education - for instance in courses delivered for PhD candidates, and those delivered to other undergraduate and postgraduate students in preparation for dissertations which require significant independent work and research. What sort of research skills do such students need, how can they learn them most effectively, and how can the transition from didactic learning to learning through research be managed? We would also be interested in how a research culture can be embedded into teaching, so that students absorb good research practice and apply it in their own work. This extends to discussion of how students can learn proper referencing, to adopt analytical, rather than purely descriptive, approaches, and how to avoid plagiarism. Issues to do with changing requirements and expectations of how to teach, and consequent changes in the relationship with research, would also be of interest. While these issues are most obviously relevant to higher education, we would also be very interested in discussion of how research methods would be relevant to those in business or other sectors. Abstract submissions only are required in the first instance. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.	Martin Rich
Mini track on The role of paradigms in business and IS research Track co-chairs: Dr Gillian Green and Dr Chris Atkinson, University of Bolton, UK The world of IS and Organisation is inherently complex. Founded on multiple paradigms and embodying a variety of tools, techniques, methods and methodologies. This mini track offers the opportunity to discuss the path by which the researcher can navigate a route to understanding. What is the relationship between epistemology and ontology? How they relate to each other? What issues does the researcher face when working in a contradictorily environment, How would they identify that this was their situation? This track offers a forum to discuss issues that form the fundamental underpinnings of quality research. Submissions are invited by researchers that have struggled to make sense of their domain, which may have been situated in conflict between paradigmatic opposites, or have identified multiple positions that have contributed to their actions. Papers are invited that investigate the informed choices of the researcher within the ontological/theoretical framework. This discussion could be described as the epitome of epistemological understanding, how to get there, and the lessons learnt on the journey should make for an interesting session. Abstract submissions only are required in the first instance. For mini track submission details, see the call for papers page.